Episode 9
009 - Lego Gringotts Bank
In this episode of the Brick Magnate Podcast, I discuss the Lego Gringotts Bank set from the Harry Potter series.
I review the build experience, the end result, and the value for money. I also address the dilemma of displaying the set alongside the Diagon Alley set and why that makes this set a little divisive for me.
Transcript
Well, hello there. Welcome to episode 9 of the Brick Magnate
Speaker:podcast. I'm your host, Mike Morrison, aka the Brick Magnate,
Speaker:and this is the show where I get to wax lyrical about Lego with
Speaker:my fellow brick building enthusiasts and review the
Speaker:latest sets that I've been obsessing over
Speaker:in recent weeks months. And today, I'm reviewing
Speaker:a fairly recent set. I'm gonna be talking
Speaker:about the LEGO Gringotts set, which only
Speaker:released a couple of months ago and had people Very excited because
Speaker:it's a huge set and also a pretty iconic one for
Speaker:Harry Potter fans. But before we get started, just a
Speaker:little reminder if you are listening to the show for the very first time or
Speaker:if you checked out a few episodes and you haven't yet subscribed, make sure you
Speaker:hit that Subscribe or follow button in your podcast app
Speaker:to ensure that you do not miss a single episode of The
Speaker:Brick Magnate Podcast. You get to follow me on my adventures
Speaker:down the rabbit hole into LEGO obsession.
Speaker:So today, let's talk about the LEGO Harry
Speaker:Potter Gringotts set. I
Speaker:was quite excited for this one. I was intrigued
Speaker:by it. It was, I'd seen rumors that a Gringotts set was
Speaker:coming, and I think a lot of people were taken aback
Speaker:by how Lego had actually approached it and designed it. So I
Speaker:was curious. And I've gotta say, for me, in my
Speaker:experiences anyway, Lego Harry Potter can be a little hit and
Speaker:miss. All the way back in episode 1, the very first episode of this
Speaker:podcast, I reviewed the Lego Hogwarts
Speaker:Express, the big Hogwarts Express set that they released,
Speaker:which, overall, was a bit of a disappointment,
Speaker:especially for that sort of premium priced
Speaker:signature set. But on the flip side, both
Speaker:the full size Hogwarts set and Diagon
Speaker:Alley. Those are really, really strong builds for me anyway.
Speaker:So I was hoping for more along those lines than some of the
Speaker:other Harry Potter sets that are out there. So did it
Speaker:deliver? Let's dive in. So this set is,
Speaker:4,803 Pieces. So
Speaker:it's a big one. It is a big one. It's about,
Speaker:2 thirds, a little more than 2 thirds the size or or
Speaker:the brick count of things like the, Millennium Falcon or the
Speaker:Razor Crest or those big UCS Star Wars sets.
Speaker:And for that, You pay $430
Speaker:or 370 British pounds,
Speaker:which is actually under the the
Speaker:measuring stick of 10¢ per piece that,
Speaker:most people will use to calculate Whether a price
Speaker:is is good value or bad value based on the brick piece count.
Speaker:It comes with 13 minuteifigs, including the main
Speaker:trio, along with Hagrid, as well as iconic characters like
Speaker:Bellatrix Lestrange and Grepook. And,
Speaker:it's an interesting set because, first of all, It's very tall.
Speaker:And that's because you not only get the bank building itself,
Speaker:but you also get the underground area with the railroad and The
Speaker:Vaults, which obviously played a huge, huge part in the movie. So that's
Speaker:really unique and visually impressive, but it's a
Speaker:double edged sword, which I'll come back to, as the review
Speaker:kind of comes on. But first, let's talk about the build experience.
Speaker:I think the best way to describe this build
Speaker:is uneven. I was going to say that
Speaker:it's a build of 2 halves since you are literally building 2
Speaker:distinct separate areas above ground, below ground, But that makes it sound
Speaker:like maybe OneHalf was good, so maybe the underground was good,
Speaker:and the building was bad, but that's not the case. They both
Speaker:had Fun build phases. But they
Speaker:were also hampered by some really boring stretches too. And it
Speaker:does Like, in the way that you're building, sometimes when you're building a a
Speaker:set that has multiple areas or multiple components, you might do a
Speaker:bit on each, but this Does feel very divided into okay. 1st,
Speaker:we're building this whole separate standalone underground bit, then we
Speaker:build the overground, and then we just pop 1 on top of the other.
Speaker:But, yeah, they both had fun myths. They both had really, really boring
Speaker:stretches. So you start the build with the underground vault area. Now,
Speaker:obviously, because the bank the building sits on
Speaker:top of this, this is kind of like
Speaker:it's its own sort of area, but it's primarily
Speaker:concerned with being a sturdy base.
Speaker:So it's more that's kind of the priority, and you can tell the priority for
Speaker:this bit. Make sure it's a solid sturdy base for the
Speaker:building, rather than make sure that it's really
Speaker:cool as a standalone section. And it does work. It
Speaker:is a solid base. The the the set doesn't really wobble.
Speaker:It doesn't feel flimsy. But it also means that,
Speaker:there's a big Stretch of pretty uninspired building,
Speaker:that is that goes into creating this kind of strong x
Speaker:shape that supports the weight of the bank above it. So
Speaker:yeah. Definitely, I think uninspired for for stretches of this when you're building
Speaker:out kind of the the foundations of That area,
Speaker:there there's some vault rooms built into that x stand and a
Speaker:few attempts to reproduce elements from the film, But you do feel like you're limited
Speaker:by the true purpose of this section in being an x
Speaker:shaped bass with a few bits and pieces tacked on. That's
Speaker:definitely what it feels more like. The thief's wall the the waterfall,
Speaker:the thief's downfall, from the movies where the card
Speaker:passes through. And if you've got any enchantments or spells, then it washes
Speaker:off those spells. Right? That's a big, big part of the movie. Right? It's kind
Speaker:of a a a main feature of this area.
Speaker:But that's a good example of what I mean by they've kind of
Speaker:just I wouldn't say phoned in, but they've been limited
Speaker:by What they could do within this section
Speaker:by having to stay true to the the main purpose, the main
Speaker:priority of this section in creating a strong base. So it's just kind of tagged
Speaker:on. It's just like a flimsy strip of blue tiles really
Speaker:awkwardly, I'm sitting on one of the axes of the base, and
Speaker:act it is quite flimsy. Like, it it's
Speaker:it doesn't There's something when you build it. It's one of the first things that
Speaker:you actually piece on to the base. And when I kinda did it, I was
Speaker:like, oh, that really? That's how they're doing that.
Speaker:It feels something weird, but it connects on with 1 little
Speaker:thin piece at the top. Anyway but I think that's
Speaker:kind of representative of,
Speaker:where I feel the shortcomings with the underground section
Speaker:of this, war. The areas it's fairly joyless
Speaker:in terms of the build, save for a few funny strikes in the vaults
Speaker:themselves, which the vault kind of just like slot in.
Speaker:I'll mention those Easter eggs in a bit, but the big highlight of this section
Speaker:comes in adding the railroad tracks
Speaker:for the carts to spin down on. Like, that's
Speaker:that's the bit that kind of salvages this section. So you have this
Speaker:spiral of railroad, and you have the
Speaker:cart that obviously will have, the characters in, and they spin
Speaker:round. They they they make their way down, and and you can have them stop
Speaker:off at at the different vaults. That's cool.
Speaker:But, unfortunately, That part doesn't come until, like,
Speaker:right at the end of the build for this section, so it
Speaker:doesn't save that experience from feeling like a bit of a slog.
Speaker:I did find myself flicking ahead in the instructions to see when I
Speaker:would get started on the bank building, which looked like it would be the more
Speaker:fun part of the process. And for the most part, it was. You know, I
Speaker:quite like modular building sets and building my LEGO city, and building,
Speaker:like, Diagon Alley and stuff like that. So I
Speaker:knew that this was the part of the build I was going to enjoy the
Speaker:most, and it was. I mostly enjoyed building the the
Speaker:bank above ground. The way in which they tackle kind of the wonky
Speaker:structure, at the front of the bank,
Speaker:was was satisfying. You know? When you see each level
Speaker:of the building come up, and you've got those kind of those askew,
Speaker:bits on the front facade. It's cool. It's just one of those little things where
Speaker:you're like, yeah. I like that. So, yeah, it was it was
Speaker:quite good. With the exception of Lego, once again, deciding to use stickers
Speaker:for the signage on the front, which obviously looks terrible compared to
Speaker:printed bricks, because, you know, you've obviously got The name of the
Speaker:bank, it's all it's it's kind of split in the middle, and there's awkward
Speaker:spacing because they've done it with stickers. Everyone hates stickers.
Speaker:Right? The interior of the bank building itself was pretty
Speaker:plain. It's mostly that ground it's
Speaker:mostly about the ground floor. There's kind of like a A small third
Speaker:floor with not much happening. But once you're done with the
Speaker:the fairly sparse detail in the,
Speaker:on the The first the ground floor where they
Speaker:have the the different, they're not checkouts. They're kind of the
Speaker:the teller stations right. It's where They walk up to,
Speaker:to the, is it dwarves or is it elves? Or is
Speaker:it goblins? It's goblins. And it's goblins. Yeah. So they walk up to
Speaker:the camp where the goblins are at, and they're they're in disguise and all of
Speaker:that. You've got that, but it's just it's just a bit anaemic. It's just a
Speaker:bit, I don't again, I don't wanna
Speaker:say phoned in, because that suggests laziness. Yeah. Maybe there
Speaker:just wasn't as much they could do with with that. But once you're
Speaker:done with that bit, the rest of it is fairly plain. You're really
Speaker:just building up 3 stories of outer walls and then the roof, which Did get
Speaker:pretty repetitive. You can tell they tried to mix it up a bit for
Speaker:this phase by having you do a bit of the building, then a bit of
Speaker:the outside, and the little random side building they add on,
Speaker:and then a little bit of a a wall that they added at the edge
Speaker:of of the the space for the baseplate. And then you're building a wall
Speaker:on the building again. So they they had you dot around that area to
Speaker:mix it up a little bit, but I don't think it really saved it during
Speaker:the more monotonous parts of the build. There was a
Speaker:dragon. So you piece together a dragon, the dragon that's down in the vaults, and
Speaker:it helps them escape. These are all spoilers for the Harry Potter movies, by the
Speaker:way, in case you've not seen them in the last, you know, 20 years.
Speaker:So that mix Things up slightly, but not enough to really elevate the overall build
Speaker:experience. So I'm gonna give this a disappointing
Speaker:2a half out of 5, which I think is fitting for a build of 2
Speaker:halves for it to get half marks. It's a shame because this
Speaker:is a big expensive set. Maybe I'm being harsh, But I think
Speaker:when you have something that's based on a phone IP like Harry
Speaker:Potter, Harry Potter, and they look on, Harry
Speaker:Potter, Yeah. When you've when you've got an IP like
Speaker:Harry Potter, especially one that's got, you
Speaker:know, a set that's got 2 very contrasting areas.
Speaker:You know, the the polished, kinda quirky, overground
Speaker:building, and then the the the cave, the natural, the the
Speaker:rock, and the stone, and the the dark and dingy
Speaker:underground. It shouldn't feel like you're
Speaker:just grinding it out, and you shouldn't be flicking ahead in
Speaker:the instructions to try and find the interesting part.
Speaker:So, Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker:A a disappointing build experience, I'm sorry to say. So let's talk
Speaker:about the end result. Well, it does Look Great. It's
Speaker:an impressive, satisfying size. It stands at
Speaker:just under 80 centimeters tall, So it's a strong signature piece
Speaker:on its own, even more so if you purge the dragon on top of the
Speaker:building. So that's gonna bring it closer to the 1 meter
Speaker:mark. So It is a striking
Speaker:piece. The contrast between above and below ground
Speaker:really works visually Despite some of the details on
Speaker:the underground section feeling a little tacked on, if you step back from the
Speaker:whole thing and look at it, like, the the contrast in the color,
Speaker:The contrast in, you know, the the neatness, even with
Speaker:the wonky walls up up top, but kind of the the neatness and the cleanness
Speaker:of what's above with The jaggedness and
Speaker:the, the kind of griminess. I'm
Speaker:not grimy, but it's a bit it's brown bricks. Right? Brown and gray
Speaker:bricks. Like, there's a good visual contrast, and it looks,
Speaker:it it does look good. There's some fun little Easter eggs in there
Speaker:for Potter fans too, particularly the addition I think
Speaker:my favorite one, the addition of a a vault containing Helga Hufflepuff's
Speaker:cup, where they added in a cool little mechanism. Fairly simple
Speaker:one, but a cool addition that emulates, the the
Speaker:I don't know if it pronounces Gem Geminio curse, the
Speaker:doubling spell. So if you kind of pop your finger and touch the cup,
Speaker:it sort of pushes back a little mechanism, and a whole bunch of
Speaker:Duplicated cups spill out of the vault.
Speaker:Call me easily pleased. You know? And
Speaker:there's also something very satisfying about seeing the rail carts
Speaker:spiraling around the base. Again, I did say I'm easily pleased. Right? But
Speaker:there is something. You know? Pop your cart on the top, and it spirals round
Speaker:and comes out the bottom. That's yeah. Fun. Right?
Speaker:Satisfying. Although on that, it
Speaker:again, though, the kart thing, it's it's a bit clunky when you're
Speaker:unloading and reloading the karts on the track. Little fiddly. I've had bits break off
Speaker:when I'm trying to do it, which I don't really want.
Speaker:So yeah. So it's It's a set that
Speaker:that maybe looks a bit better from a few steps back
Speaker:than it does up close. When you start getting into the details, it's a bit
Speaker:disappointing. It's a little clunky. And so where having
Speaker:the 2 sections of Above and Below Ground really becomes a double edged
Speaker:sword, though, is if you're planning on adding Gringotts
Speaker:to your existing Diagon Alley set. And that's what
Speaker:I'd intended on doing. I've got Diagon Alley. It's got Honeydukes. It's got
Speaker:the, joke shop. It's, it's it's got
Speaker:Ollivanders. I think it's got Burt and Botts. It's got all
Speaker:all the shops. It's missing Gringotts. And so, you
Speaker:know, my first thought when I get it,
Speaker:is I'm going to, you know, add it to the display where I
Speaker:have Diagon Alley. I can't even remember. Gringot is in Diagon Alley.
Speaker:Right? It is. I don't know. My Harry Potter
Speaker:law is getting away from me. But I think, you know, Lego
Speaker:marketed it on the basis of, You know, hey.
Speaker:You can take the bank off the base, and you can display it with your
Speaker:diagonal alley buildings. Right? This completes your diagonal alley set.
Speaker:So that's what I'd intended on doing. And I think it was smart of
Speaker:LEGO to make it so the bank building is on its own
Speaker:baseplate. It can be lifted off the underground section displayed separately.
Speaker:And if you did that, you would never know that that's not what it was
Speaker:originally designed for. So they presumably did that knowing that a lot of
Speaker:people who would spend all this money, who
Speaker:would be willing to spend $430 on this set,
Speaker:are also probably the same audience who would have spent
Speaker:the $500 or 600, whatever it was, for,
Speaker:the Diagon Alley set. Right? So
Speaker:that set, I think, was released a couple of years ago. And so,
Speaker:yeah, maybe they're thinking, okay. That profile of a Lego buyer
Speaker:will be in a place now where they're gonna spend 100 of dollars. They're gonna
Speaker:get Gringotts. They're already likely to have Diagon Alley all
Speaker:by the 2 together. So, you know, if if you're one of
Speaker:those people, that's fantastic. But now you're left with the dilemma
Speaker:of what to do with the lower section, because it
Speaker:it's no good on its own. It doesn't work on its own. It
Speaker:doesn't look good on its own. If you just look at the
Speaker:base, the underground section stand alone. You can tell
Speaker:it's missing something. If you just look at the building, the bank on its
Speaker:own, you wouldn't know that it's missing the underground.
Speaker:Right. But it wouldn't work to have
Speaker:the underground attached if you're putting the bank next to the
Speaker:Diagon Alley buildings. So suddenly
Speaker:that base area, the underground area becomes redundant. And if you're
Speaker:displaying Gringotts next to Diagon Alley, That base
Speaker:area, half of the set is gonna end up shoved in a corner
Speaker:or in a cupboard somewhere. And that's not ideal for something that took up Half
Speaker:of the build and accounts for a big part of the cost of the set.
Speaker:You know, you pay $400 for this, you gotta shove $200 worth in a
Speaker:cupboard. Right? Now, obviously, this doesn't apply to everyone, but given the fact that
Speaker:Lego did specifically mark this set based on the
Speaker:fact you can Take the bank off the
Speaker:base and display alongside Diagon Alley.
Speaker:Like, they did that deliberately, and they're assuming there's more than a
Speaker:few people in their audience who will want to do that. So
Speaker:that's definitely a mark against this set for me. It might sound harsh,
Speaker:But any set where you have to face the choice of sticking half of it
Speaker:in a cupboard somewhere needs to have that factored into my scoring.
Speaker:So I'm gonna give this a 3.5 end result. If you don't
Speaker:have Diagon Alley, then maybe it's a fall for you. The
Speaker:underground area definitely lets this set down, in
Speaker:all areas other than the the the railroad.
Speaker:And other people probably won't find that as as,
Speaker:Satisfying as I do. Like, yeah, I'm easily pleased having the
Speaker:car to go around in a spiral and being able to have them stop at
Speaker:the different vaults. I like it. It's cool. That that kind of salvages
Speaker:what is otherwise a pretty uninspired area.
Speaker:So, yeah, the underground area lets it down. The use of stickers definitely lets
Speaker:it down. That really annoys me that that the Gringotts
Speaker:sign is is stickers. And the kind of
Speaker:sparseness of the interior of the bank itself. As someone
Speaker:who likes modular buildings, and I like The
Speaker:the little details on each floor, but this doesn't have much of that going on.
Speaker:So, yeah, 3a half end result, and that mostly
Speaker:It just comes from how visually impressive the set is
Speaker:from a few steps back. So
Speaker:finally value for money. This was not a cheap set, but it does sit at
Speaker:the right side of the 10¢ per, item per per brick
Speaker:count line in terms of Average costs. It
Speaker:should be pointed out, however, that a bunch of those pieces that make up the
Speaker:brick count are single square tiles or dots,
Speaker:as well as little spiral cone thingies. That's not their official
Speaker:name. It's the one they use for the stalagmites and stalactites in the underground
Speaker:area. I don't want I don't know why. I just don't like them. I don't
Speaker:know if it's because they're like rubbery, and I like my I like my plastic.
Speaker:I just don't like them. And, Yeah. I'm overly critical
Speaker:when you've got a high brick count, but you've got a load of these tiny
Speaker:little pieces. It feels like that detracts from the value
Speaker:you're getting. You know, if you look at the brick count for the LEGO Bowser
Speaker:where almost every piece was a thick, substantial,
Speaker:chunky piece, and then you have a set which is
Speaker:you know, you've got hundreds of the thin one square
Speaker:tiles. You can't you can't compare those in
Speaker:terms of value. Anyway, that's just my weird
Speaker:neurosis over this. There is a decent amount of minifigures
Speaker:with this set, but, again, you have the same thing that they've done
Speaker:with other Harry Potter sets where they've included multiples of the same
Speaker:character at different ages to reflect the different
Speaker:visits that they made to Gringotts over the series. So
Speaker:you have young Harry, with Hagrid, which I think is
Speaker:is to represent the 1st series, but then You have the
Speaker:older trio of Harry, Ron, Hermione,
Speaker:to represent. I think it's the 6th movie that they go there, or
Speaker:maybe the the 7th. 6th is hard blood print, so that's not when they go.
Speaker:So with the 8, I get confused. 7 books, 8 movies.
Speaker:Yeah? So I think it's the 7th movie they got. Anyway, nobody cares.
Speaker:But, yeah, you end up with that duplication, which is a little bit annoying, especially
Speaker:if you bought other sets. Like, I don't know how
Speaker:many Harrys I've got now. I've got too many Harrys, too many Hermione's.
Speaker:They're not unique and different and distinct enough, to warrant that.
Speaker:So, Again, this does sound like I'm nitpicking. Right?
Speaker:But anyone who's built other Harry Potter sets probably has already
Speaker:more Harrys run than Hermione's, and they can shake a stick at. They're really not
Speaker:gonna want more. But, you know, there are some additions in there.
Speaker:I don't think I've got a Bellatrix, minifig from any
Speaker:other sets. Might have it from Grimmauld Place possibly. Don't
Speaker:think I've got it from Hogwarts. So, you know, having a a
Speaker:Beltrix, having Grippook, again, I've definitely not got him from
Speaker:another set. They're cool. Overall, I
Speaker:can't give this too high a mark for value for money though, given that the
Speaker:The pretty the bill experience was pretty average,
Speaker:bordering on disappointing, and again, you just can't escape the
Speaker:problem of What happens if you wanted to
Speaker:display this alongside Diagon Alley, which is how they marketed
Speaker:the set? That's not That's not me wanting to do
Speaker:something that is contrary to the purpose of
Speaker:this set. They use that as a strong marketing angle.
Speaker:And yeah. I mean, it's it's
Speaker:tricky. Right now, I haven't actually, I'm doing nothing with it. It's Still it's
Speaker:still on my my desk my hobby desk while I do my builds
Speaker:because I'm annoyed at the fact that I'll need
Speaker:to I'll need to find somewhere to just shove the the underground
Speaker:bit. Or you get the real, kind of like, the real
Speaker:ninja Lego builders where They
Speaker:they'll do something to raise up the other buildings
Speaker:in Diagon Alley, and they'll just have The below part
Speaker:kind of sit below the street level. Like, that's kind of the only way you
Speaker:could display them together, but that's that's getting a little crazy. Right?
Speaker:So yeah. It's a tough one because you really can't fault them
Speaker:for making it possible to display the bank as a standalone thing, but
Speaker:I don't actually think it'd be right. Yeah. I don't think it'd be right to
Speaker:dock points in my review just based on the Diagon Alley problem.
Speaker:But even so, based on the build experience and some
Speaker:some let downs in the end result. I've still got to give this a
Speaker:pretty mid range 3a half out of 5 for value for
Speaker:money. Brick count to to dollar price,
Speaker:it's on the right side of things, especially for a licensed
Speaker:IP set. If you're
Speaker:displaying it standalone, you're gonna be happy with it.
Speaker:But the build, It wasn't a fun build. It just
Speaker:wasn't a fun build. You know, you want a build that you
Speaker:enjoy that maybe has 1 or 2 boring bits, not a bill that's
Speaker:boring that has 1 or 2 enjoyable bits. Right? And that definitely
Speaker:impacts value for money because you're paying for that experience too.
Speaker:So while I wouldn't say that this set was a letdown overall, I do think
Speaker:it suffered for its own ambition to create that 2 tiered result.
Speaker:The practicalities of this made from mixed bag of the
Speaker:underground area and a relatively sparse upper building, and, of course,
Speaker:you have the Diagon Alley quandary in there as well.
Speaker:Thing is, though, I don't actually think they could have done it any other way.
Speaker:Had they just released The upper building, they would have been slated for missing out
Speaker:the best bit in terms of what you see in the movies. And if they'd
Speaker:ignored the Diagon Alley crowd and made it more of a complete
Speaker:set that couldn't be separated. So you're not building 2 halves and piecing them together.
Speaker:You're building 1 cohesive set. I think they'd catch
Speaker:heat for that as well. Maybe they should have done it a
Speaker:little how they've done the recent smaller Hogwarts
Speaker:and and Hogwarts grounds set. Right?
Speaker:So I don't know if you've seen it, but you've obviously got the big, big
Speaker:Hogwarts set. That was, like, 600, $700. But
Speaker:they released a smaller scale one that actually is
Speaker:more more of a model of the the the broader grounds of
Speaker:of Hogwarts. And so the Hogwarts itself is smaller.
Speaker:You've got more of the surrounding area. Maybe they they cut in on something a
Speaker:little bit like that with, Gringotts,
Speaker:where the building itself is smaller, but, actually,
Speaker:you use more space for the underground area. Right? I don't know.
Speaker:Who knows? So yeah. I think it it would the
Speaker:choice to do this, I think they they had to do Gringotts at
Speaker:some point because people wanted it, But it was a bit of a
Speaker:poison chalice, not unlike Helga Hufflepuff's cup,
Speaker:ironically. So overall, this wasn't the letdown
Speaker:that the Hogwarts Express set was. That that for me is the low bar
Speaker:for pre like, the premium signature Harry Potter pieces,
Speaker:but it's definitely not hitting the heights of other sets like Hogwarts
Speaker:itself or, of course, like Diagon Alley. So this is
Speaker:probably divisive. I'd love to hear what you think. You can connect with
Speaker:me on, Instagram and on TikTok. I am at
Speaker:brickmagnate. Brick, m a g, and a t e
Speaker:on both of those platforms. If you wanna let me know what you thought of
Speaker:the set, whether you agree or disagree or feel
Speaker:particularly strongly, about anything I've talked about
Speaker:here, then let me know. Of course, if you follow me on those platforms,
Speaker:you'll find videos and other behind the scenes looks at
Speaker:the different sets that I talk about in the show, as well as some that
Speaker:I don't. And, be sure to hit that subscribe
Speaker:button or head to brickmagnate.com for
Speaker:past episodes and future episodes of the show. Next
Speaker:week, I'm gonna be talking about The Lego set I swore I
Speaker:would never buy, but then I caved and bought
Speaker:it and didn't regret it. Find out what that set
Speaker:was and get the full review of it on next week's episode.
Speaker:For now, thank you so much for joining me for another edition of The
Speaker:Brick Magnate podcast, and I'll see you all next week.
